From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 12:50:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 0624C1065673; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:50:55 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Nikola Le??i?? Message-ID: <20081229125055.GA50791@FreeBSD.org> References: <20081029201710.1854f44b@anthesphoria.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081029201710.1854f44b@anthesphoria.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: nvidia-driver and shadows X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:50:55 -0000 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:17:10PM +0100, Nikola Le??i?? wrote: > Hello, Hi, and sorry for awfully belated reply. > > I'm curious what is the idea behind > > @exec mv -f %D/%%MODULESDIR%%/libwfb.so %D/%%MODULESDIR%%/XXX-libwfb.so.%%%%.%%XSERVVERSION%% && ln -sf libnvidia-wfb.so.1 %D/%%MODULESDIR%%/libwfb.so > > in ports/nvidia-driver/pkg-plist? If this is so, there is no way to get > shadows working in Emerald. If I revert the situation, i.e. set the link > like this manually: > > libwfb.so -> XXX-libwfb.so.%%.xorg-server-1.4.2,1 > > then I have shadows with no obvious ill effect. The same is true for > driver versions 173 and 177. Interesting. FWIW, nVidia creates the symlink libwfb.so -> libnvidia-wfb.so.1 itself (per their Makefiles), the line above is to mimic this behavior when installing from package. Have you tried asking on nVidia's official forums or maillists? I will certainly conduct more tests myself. Thanks. ./danfe