From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 5 15:22:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B08E34; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:22:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D6B22B3; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro-9.local (c-67-180-208-218.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.208.218]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19AE81A3C39; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51FFC31D.3080304@mu.org> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 08:22:05 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri Subject: Re: Linux epoll(7) patch References: <51FF7211.6020909@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <51FF7211.6020909@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Roman Divacky , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:22:06 -0000 On 8/5/13 2:36 AM, Yuri wrote: > There is the patch, suggested by Roman Divacky, implementing Linux > epoll(7) functionality: > http://rys.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/patches/linux_epoll.patch > > This patch was suggested 5 years ago and was discussed on emulation@: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2008-March/004409.html > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2008-March/004428.html > > > Discussion stalled back then, and epoll is still unimplemented. > > Anybody can identify any issues with this patch? > Are there any alternatives? > > Yuri The patch is small. I too am wondering why it's not committed, was there any push back? -- Alfred Perlstein