Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:02:43 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.options.mk status Message-ID: <1189461763.22893.78.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070910220013.GO29407@amilo.cenkes.org> References: <20070909194620.GB14713@hades.panopticon> <1189368742.17083.37.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070909220132.GC14713@hades.panopticon> <1189376094.17083.57.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070910152612.GA15850@hades.panopticon> <1189443514.22893.10.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070910220013.GO29407@amilo.cenkes.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-NmR0mnkii6PyA6k4shbF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andrew Pantyukhin p=ED=B9e v =FAt 11. 09. 2007 v 02:00 +0400:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:58:34PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Dmitry Marakasov p=ED=B9e v po 10. 09. 2007 v 19:26 +0400:
> > > * Pav Lucistnik (pav@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > > > It's possible to use this feature, but only on -CURRENT and -ST=
ABLE
> > > > > > FreeBSD systems newer than certain date. No existing release su=
pports it
> > > > > > - it will be supported in upcoming 6.3 and 7.0.
> > > > > Erm, isn't ports code (more or less) release-independent? What's =
missing
> > > > > in existing FreeBSD versions that's needed to support options.mk?
> > > > The make only looks into /usr/share/mk for includes, until told
> > > > otherwise. bsd.port.options.mk is included before bsd.port.pre.mk, =
so it
> > > > can't be found. Base system was modified to install stub of the sam=
e
> > > > name into /usr/share/mk to workaround this problem.
> > > Understood. Then we really have to wait till 5.5 and 6.2 EOL to use
> > > options.mk... That's a bit strange to wait multiple years for an
> > > useful feature, aren't there any workaround planned?
> >=20
> > The question is, are there any workarounds possible?
>=20
> So am I missing something or is it as trivial as using these four
> lines instead of one:
>=20
> USEOPTIONSMK=3D yes
> INOPTIONSMK=3D yes
> .include "bsd.port.mk"
> .undef INOPTIONSMK
No idea, does it work? My only problem with that is it looks rather
scary :)
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
It whines, glows and fades...
--=-NmR0mnkii6PyA6k4shbF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBG5b7/ntdYP8FOsoIRApJ9AJ9b9JVS4td6DKTTAjaGOAHv5DEoSwCgkWBF
M5dEaJUznkCRJd+/EktyYWg=
=trV6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-NmR0mnkii6PyA6k4shbF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1189461763.22893.78.camel>