From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 20 12:33:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3558916A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:33:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtphost.cis.strath.ac.uk (smtphost.cis.strath.ac.uk [130.159.196.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB6643D2D for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chodgins@cis.strath.ac.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (chrishodgins.force9.co.uk [84.92.20.141]) j0KCXYaG014245 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:33:34 GMT Message-ID: <41EFA629.8010707@cis.strath.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:38:01 +0000 From: Chris Hodgins User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050113) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CIS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@cis.strath.ac.uk for more information X-CIS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CIS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 6) X-CIS-MailScanner-From: chodgins@cis.strath.ac.uk Subject: Re: pdflib for php X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:33:45 -0000 Thanos Tsouanas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 12:11:04PM +0200, Cristi Tauber wrote: > >>===> pdflib-6.0.1 is forbidden: >>http://vuxml.freebsd.org/fc7e6a42-6012-11d9-a9e7-0001020eed82.html. >> >> Forbidden ? Why ? anyone ... > > > Yes this one: just follow the link. (pretty obvious ;)) > > If you insist in installing the port, 'un' break it manually. > > HTH > Purely out of curiosity.. when a possible exploit such as this is discovered in a port and a patch is provided, why is it not patched immediately? I understand that when a vulnerability is discovered it is important to look for similar bugs in the file and also the entire port. Is this what takes the time or is it purely a maintainer finding the time to update it? Again this is just out of curiosity and not related to this port in particular. Chris