From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 07:25:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A610516A4CE; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:25:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4834643D66; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBD7Rtlt039578; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:27:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41BD43CD.3000900@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:25:01 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Suleiman Souhlal References: <94AE3F5A-4CD6-11D9-8BD6-000A95C4D7BC@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <94AE3F5A-4CD6-11D9-8BD6-000A95C4D7BC@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl locking X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:25:21 -0000 Suleiman Souhlal wrote: > Hello, > > The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/sysctl-locking.diff > removes Giant from the sysctl subsystem. > I tested it on i386 and powerpc, where it appears to work perfectly. > However, I have not been able to test it on an SMP box, as I don't have > access to any. > So I would appreciate it if someone would test it, and report any problems. > I will commit it in about week, unless, of course, there are > objections/problems. > > Bye > -- Please don't start setting timeouts for committing this until you've thoroughly tested it on a real SMP system, preferable on all of our tier-1 SMP platforms, and have gotten some review. If no one steps forward to review this patch then let me know and I'll make sure it happens. Scott