From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Sun Jun 12 13:07:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABC0AF0B2C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44A82F7B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bC56o-000EaQ-T8; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:07:22 +0200 Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:07:22 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qjail or qjail2? Message-ID: <20160612130722.GC41922@home.opsec.eu> References: <6d708ff4-de99-bfc5-f2d7-2568fa368256@gjunka.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6d708ff4-de99-bfc5-f2d7-2568fa368256@gjunka.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:07:25 -0000 Hi! > Which qjail should I use, qjail 4.7 or qjail2 2.2? Does the qjail > project have any documentation apart from http://qjail.sourceforge.net/? qjail, as qjail2 is a non-longer updated version of qjail, as far as I understand. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !