From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jan 6 21:47:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from lists.blarg.net (lists.blarg.net [206.124.128.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E02737B400 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from thig.blarg.net (thig.blarg.net [206.124.128.18]) by lists.blarg.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D771ABD39 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([206.124.139.115]) by thig.blarg.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA17835 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:47:46 -0800 Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g075mRa42141; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:48:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from swear@blarg.net) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: afio in ports/sysutils or ports/archivers From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: 06 Jan 2002 21:48:27 -0800 Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm thinking "afio" should be in ports/archivers instead of the current ports/sysutils. Sure, it may be used to move files around in one command (unlike the other archivers?), but that isn't good enough reason to segregate it from the other archivers where it's harder for people to find when they're looking for an archiver. Or is this one of those decisions that can't be easily reversed? On another front, didn't I see a bunch of perl script ports that were listed in two categories? I don't remember where I saw that and I don't see it in /usr/ports/REAMDE.html, but I was wondering if afio could somehow be multiply listed if it can't be moved. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message