Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:34:51 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen)
Cc:        imp@village.org (Warner Losh), arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The whole libc thing.
Message-ID:  <200102160034.RAA11196@usr08.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010215125446.7929A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from "Daniel Eischen" at Feb 15, 2001 01:14:44 PM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > : Let's just bump the libraries and be done with it.
> > 
> > That's *ALL* the libraries, even in ports?
> 
> Hmm, perhaps not then.  It would be nice to get rid of __sF; if we
> don't do it now, will we ever?

While you are at it, break out libresolv, even if you end up
linking libc.so against libresolv.so, so that programs won't
notice.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102160034.RAA11196>