From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 12:20:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D960B16A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.omut.org (mail.omut.org [216.218.215.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E3B43D39 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:20:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lxv@omut.org) Received: from omut.org (node-4024009a.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.0.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.omut.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0AKKJHw005801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:20:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lxv@omut.org) Message-ID: <40005E83.6030202@omut.org> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:20:19 -0800 From: Alex Vasylenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BSDC References: <20040106050002.GA5271@Amber.XtremeDev.com> In-Reply-To: <20040106050002.GA5271@Amber.XtremeDev.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devfs_set_ruleset doesn't seem to like jail_cvs_devfs_ruleset="4" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:20:23 -0000 BSDC wrote: > Yet when I do a listing of /var/jail/172.16.1.1/dev, it still lists all > the devices, none are hidden. Any suggestions as to what's going on, and > why rule #4 (copied /etc/defaults/devfs.conf to /etc/devfs.conf) doesn't > seem to be applied? does the patch in the following PR help? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/56748 -- Alex.