From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Tue Jan 30 12:12:14 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8284EC5CFC
 for <freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [148.251.9.81])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883C469908;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.23.186] (unknown [89.113.128.32])
 (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
 by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 199876D3;
 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:12:12 +0300 (MSK)
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: How to avoid building of all llvm/clang-related stuff on recent
 CURRENT?
To: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
References: <1eddd30d-2743-890f-3e9b-eff06a1d9a41@FreeBSD.org>
 <37FC8627-D520-4BAF-B168-783F39F44CAF@FreeBSD.org>
 <16ef72c6-38b1-5c58-bd0f-ab5d4eebf743@ShaneWare.Biz>
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: FreeBSD
Message-ID: <7e07a3a7-21ba-4770-8dd3-feff92b41f7a@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:12:11 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <16ef72c6-38b1-5c58-bd0f-ab5d4eebf743@ShaneWare.Biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:12:14 -0000

On 30.01.2018 7:05, Shane Ambler wrote:

> You may also (soon) need WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD, there are plans to enable
> LLD by default.
 I think, WITHOUT_LLD should be enough, together with WITHOUT_LLD_BOOTSTRAP.

> Looking at man src.conf on current,
> 
> WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER enforces -
>   WITHOUT_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP
>   WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP
>   WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP
>   WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP
> 
> I think WITHOUT_LLD_BOOTSTRAP might belong in that list.
 Yess!

> There is also a WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN which enforces -
>   WITHOUT_BINUTILS
>   WITHOUT_CLANG
>   WITHOUT_CLANG_EXTRAS
>   WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL
>   WITHOUT_GCC
>   WITHOUT_GDB
>   WITHOUT_INCLUDES
>   WITHOUT_LLD
>   WITHOUT_LLDB
> 
> which WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD might also belong to, there is no mention of
> other options enforcing it.
 I don't remember now why I use WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN only at installworld
stage… There was a reason, but I don't remember it!

> Shouldn't nanobsd disable these by default?
 nanobsd doesn't disable anything by default, and, IMHO, it is right way
to go.

-- 
// Lev Serebryakov