From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jul 7 21:58:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F212837B400 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soulshock.mail.pas.earthlink.net (soulshock.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F54B43E4A for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:58:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net (goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.18]) by soulshock.mail.pas.earthlink.net (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g684a9R20808 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool0280.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.25] helo=mindspring.com) by goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17RQE5-00063v-00; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 21:34:18 -0700 Message-ID: <3D29161F.78694FA7@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 21:33:35 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: Marcus Reid , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Remove UUCP from default install? References: <20020708011523.GA10512@blazingdot.com> <3D290F0B.A5A943AF@mindspring.com> <1026102422.1697.9.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:33, Terry Lambert wrote: > > It seems to me that it's the source of at least one very recent well > > documented security problem, and just adds steps to being able to use > > a box in the first place... even UUCP hasn't has a vulnerability > > announcement as recently as SSH. > > More people use SSH than UUCP. > > We've already had this discussion that's why UUCP isn't in -stable any > more. > > Until FreeBSD's ports structure is properly able to cope with stuff like > SSH in the base without hacks then it is probably easier that it remains > in CVS. OK, 5 ways. ;^). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message