From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 10 13:45:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BE116A4E6 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D62443D58 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:45:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fzw4M-0007tY-BO for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:45:02 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:45:02 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:45:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:40:05 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <20060709155759.GA67709@psconsult.nl> <200607101157.53801.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200607101157.53801.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Sender: news Subject: Re: Which geom to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:45:49 -0000 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > You can use nested labels. Or he can try gpt: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=gpt Only AFAIK this implementation doesn't allow modifying the table when the partitions are used (mounted) - is this (still) correct?