From owner-freebsd-net Thu Nov 29 7:38:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx3.uninterruptible.net (cyclonis.catonic.net [63.160.99.136]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70B237B434 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 07:38:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.uninterruptible.net (ns1.uninterruptible.net [216.7.46.11]) by mx3.uninterruptible.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C41C5501 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:33:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from Spaz.Catonic.NET (tnt6-216-180-4-13.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.4.13]) by mail.uninterruptible.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4D250055 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:38:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: by Spaz.Catonic.NET (Postfix, from userid 1002) id D60703322; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:38:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Spaz.Catonic.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E5F4C25 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:38:19 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:38:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Kris Kirby To: Subject: Etherchannel emulation / channel bonding? Message-ID: X-Tech-Support-Email: bofh@catonic.net X-Frames: I hate frames. Organization: Non Illegitemus Carborundum MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What's our current best recommended solution for channel-bonding ethernet cards? Netgraph? ----- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. | IM: KrisBSD ------------------------------------------------------- "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message