From owner-freebsd-security Fri May 29 16:12:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA26690 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 29 May 1998 16:12:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adk.gr (COREDUMP.CIS.UPENN.EDU [158.130.6.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA26674 for ; Fri, 29 May 1998 16:12:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu) Received: from dsl.cis.upenn.edu (H-135-207-24-124.research.att.com [135.207.24.124]) by adk.gr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA24031 for ; Fri, 29 May 1998 19:11:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199805292311.TAA24031@adk.gr> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Tunneling Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 19:06:09 EDT From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Tunneling Cc: Date: 05/29/98, 19:06:07 Actually, almost all vendors interoperate with each other these days. You should be looking at either the ANX or the NIST interop results, which are more recent. - -Angelos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBNW8/X70pBjh2h1kFAQEFXwP+IuHDkocqUUFEa6ypg7mW/0GcoNPnnP6J cuSyT875oUJhdEcR3PP8okYgy4pzBEJA+uYnxN3v120IxAk/hRiZjQSvrylc7Ejn bwiLGRHk3947gnl3j79rZd8GrPzIHWv87rPNi2bhF4bvcE/OInXnhSa860unY52c WK8JKwBdDus= =IRC4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message