From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 16:06:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46FE16A400 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2A213C455 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A0285C8FC; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:45:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28339-07; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:45:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8714685C8E8; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:45:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF7F4A93B; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:45:42 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:45:42 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Evren Yurtesen , hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <461A33A9.4070809@ispro.net.tr> References: <461A33A9.4070809@ispro.net.tr> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: jail cpu/memory resource limits question X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:06:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, April 09, 2007 15:38:01 +0300 Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Hi, > > FreeBSD supports jail cpu/memory resource limits. > http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits > > I hear that these are very inefficient (compared to FreeVPS for example) > and with over 1000 processes it creates noticable overhead. Is this true? Unless I'm missing something, these aren't included *in* FreeBSD at this time, but are only distributed as patches to it ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGIPcm4QvfyHIvDvMRAqVjAJ9Zz7136v341RnqvLvdiy+LkUUTvQCffyoL teIcJfeSXqjrob53cF6L+qo= =dFQd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----