Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:14:47 +0200
From:      Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
To:        Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Subject:   Re: ProPolice symbols in libc or libssp ?
Message-ID:  <20050728221447.GF68965@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050728023239.GA21179@britannica.bec.de>
References:  <20050705153933.GP73907@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050726232645.GN1610@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050727000054.GA15018@britannica.bec.de> <20050727233842.GW1610@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050728023239.GA21179@britannica.bec.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Make sure you patch the right place and _not_ the shared part. Does the
> attached patch work for you?

Yes, this worked, thank you !  This implies that libssp must be linked
with -nodefaultlibs option to avoid linking itself against libssp.  But
this also prevents it from being linked against libgcc.  Is it
something harmful or not (in other words should I manually add -lgcc to
LDFLAGS) ?

Best regards,
-- 
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050728221447.GF68965>