Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:14:07 +0900 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to share directories b/n jails on 6.0? Message-ID: <200602041014.13550.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060203190008.S61891@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <20060203190008.S61891@bravo.pjkh.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2045839.HMu0Y6l5dG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Saturday 04 February 2006 10:02=E3=80=81Philip Hallstrom =E3=81=95=E3=82=93= =E3=81=AF=E6=9B=B8=E3=81=8D=E3=81=BE=E3=81=97=E3=81=9F: > Hi - > > I've got a new 6.0 box and have setup some jails. I'd like to share > /usr/ports from the host, to each of the jails. > > I tried mount_unionfs and while it worked, the box would crash if I did > anything intensive (ie. compile a port). > > Googling around and people say they are using nullfs okay, but the manpage > ends with: > > THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) > AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN > RISK. BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET. > > But then I also some some posts suggesting this no longer applied to 6.0. > > Advice? > > Thanks! nullfs is how people do it. It is probably no longer dangerous as people u= se=20 jails often and nullfs for data sharing. =2D-=20 Emails appear more personalised with signatures. --nextPart2045839.HMu0Y6l5dG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4//lSMnO3Fce5JgRAoFdAJ935al2yIs1TCCyKd9Uf+PuFvbTZACfTcPe FSHwcb9y0r2NXPU6zzt48Nc= =H3Li -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2045839.HMu0Y6l5dG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602041014.13550.kjelderg>