Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:06:09 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r371752 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel Message-ID: <20141030150609.GA2894@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20141030154742.6f91bb2a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201410301441.s9UEfML5065281@svn.freebsd.org> <20141030154742.6f91bb2a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:47:42PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD= =2Eorg> wrote: > > Author: bapt > > Date: Thu Oct 30 14:41:21 2014 > > New Revision: 371752 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/371752 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r371752/ > >=20 > > Log: > > Update to 1.4.0.a4 > > Changes: > > - Reinstall packages if one of its dependency have change > > While hackish this allows seamless upgrade of perl5 and ruby2 >=20 > If p5-* and ruby-* packages change after a perl or ruby update > shouldn't their PORTREVISION be bumped? They should be bumping 5k ports is not something we could do easily :( regards, Bapt --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlRSU+EACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwI3gCgk3R6pbjxcLilHjj3DNY3ci/P UdQAnjf8dgroWTLy2oGNfClt9LvB5bDx =oZ3Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141030150609.GA2894>