From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 12:37:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F93416A41F for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:37:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3873943D46 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:37:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 14949 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2005 12:37:44 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Sep 2005 12:37:44 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C0E57E5; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 08:37:41 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Forrest Aldrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4321D164.5000602@forrie.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 10 Sep 2005 08:37:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4321D164.5000602@forrie.com> Message-ID: <44wtlp3xpm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: sysctl or system tweak for symbolic links? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:37:45 -0000 Forrest Aldrich writes: > Using FreeBSD_6.0_Beta4 (applies to Beta2, also). > > I'm trying to track down a problem I've been having with apache-2.0.54 > not following symbolic links. > > It's basically come down to my being able to follow the link if it's > in the same directory structure (ie: .. or /path/to/..), but fails if > the symbolic link is located elsewhere (ie: /usr/local/path/directory) > or on another disk. > > I wonder if there's a sysctl or other system variable that handles the > behavior of or access to symbolic links in this fashion that I may > have missed. Seemed like a reasonable conclusion after these tests > have been failing, though it could be something else, too. Seems like an Apache issue to me. Why do you think it has anything to do with the OS?