From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 2 15:18:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA12059 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:18:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from set.spradley.tmi.net (set.spradley.tmi.net [207.170.107.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA12012 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:18:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tsprad@set.spradley.tmi.net) Received: from localhost (set.spradley.tmi.net) [127.0.0.1] by set.spradley.tmi.net with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #2) id 0y9ev9-0007Ri-00; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:46:55 -0600 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: "John S. Dyson" cc: karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se (Mikael Karpberg), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Mar 1998 17:50:17 EST." <199803022250.RAA14700@dyson.iquest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 17:46:55 -0600 From: Ted Spradley Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > You *definitely* make very valid points, but 2.2.X is becoming too difficult > to maintain, and people are too tempted to use -current (with negative > consequences.) This is a difficult judgement call, and I don't think the > decisions have been made final. No one has commented on Terry Lambert's suggestion to change the name from 3.0 to 2.3. I suppose that's just meaningless marketing silliness, especially when your product is free, but I expected to see some comment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message