From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 17:18:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE0616A4CF for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipop5.tm.net.my (service.tm.net.my [202.188.95.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0314F43F75 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:18:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kaeru@streamyx.com) Received: from av2.secure.tmnet ([172.22.0.14])Oct 18 current@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:18:05 +0800 (SGT) Received: from wolverine.home.net ([219.95.57.39]) by av2.secure.tmnet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0HPJ00JMUYA41P@av2.secure.tmnet> for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:18:04 +0800 (SGT) Received: from wolverine.home.net (localhost.home.net [127.0.0.1]) by wolverine.home.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB81I3cX017994; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:18:03 +0800 Received: (from kaeru@localhost) by wolverine.home.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB81HxpW017964; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:17:59 +0800 (MYT envelope-from kaeru) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 09:17:58 +0800 From: Khairil Yusof In-reply-to: <20031207082612.D4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> To: Jeff Roberson Message-id: <20031208011758.GA925@wolverine.home.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i References: <20031207082612.D4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE and current. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 01:18:10 -0000 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 08:30:13AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > of feedback while running ULE. For anyone else, if your workload is > either improved or hindered, I'd appreciate a mail with the a description > of your workload, your hardware, behavior with ULE, and behavior with > 4BSD. Haven't been running ULE for a while, because I was till having slight sticky mouse problems. This is no longer the case when I tried it again yesterday. However as reported by Sean nice processes (+20) are not behaving nicely. With a niced -j2 make kernel in the background, my keyboard interactivity is badly affected (mouse is not affected however). I am not however experiencing any problems with sound. Usage is mainly for general desktop/development use. Repeating this test with 4BSD, overall interactivity feels slightly slower, no problems with keyboard, and most importantly non-niced processes are not being affected much by the nice +20 kernel build. hardware: dual p3-450 workload: general gnome desktop + kernel build (niced -20) other : libkse threading as default Even with nice problem, the overall improved interactivity and non-sticky mouse makes ULE better by default for my usage now.=20 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/09FFDAqnLW/+/X8RAsu5AJ41arrfCts1P4Z61SQpKUYxeA/1WQCg8hUK hE6BWpq7Vxd0ArD5pYtNLUw= =5WFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--