From owner-freebsd-isp Fri May 29 09:29:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA08420 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 29 May 1998 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from java.dpcsys.com (java.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA08391 for ; Fri, 29 May 1998 09:28:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by java.dpcsys.com (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id JAA04557; Fri, 29 May 1998 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Busarow To: Brian Lube cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bind revisited In-Reply-To: <13371622019371@mpinet.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 29 May 1998, Brian Lube wrote: > I'm currently working on securing up our BSD box, I apologize in advance > if this has already been beaten to death, but what is the best way to > secure my copy of bind? Should I upgrade to 8.1.1 and then keep up to date > with patches, or is there going to be some sort of update for the 4 series? > We are currently looking to upgrade to the 8.1.1 series, but we're not > really sure how much work it is going to entail. Upgrade to 8.1.2 4.9.x will continue to recieve security updates but the change to 8.1.x is not bad at all and you will see lots of benefits. Lower memory use, better performance and more knobs to tweak. Dan -- Dan Busarow 949 443 4172 DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message