From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 7 18:15:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394EA16A4CE; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:15:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from gddsn.org.cn (mail.gddsn.org.cn [210.21.6.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27EB43D49; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:15:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wsk@gddsn.org.cn) Received: from gddsn.org.cn (unknown [211.96.21.195]) by gddsn.org.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FFC38CB94; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:15:53 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <404BD754.5070006@gddsn.org.cn> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:15:48 +0800 From: wsk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; zh-CN; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov , current@freebsd.org References: <404A821D.7020506@gddsn.org.cn> <20040307224133.GA2119@ip.net.ua> <404BB663.3000707@gddsn.org.cn> <20040308010509.GA25748@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040308010509.GA25748@ip.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 23:40:34 -0800 Subject: Re: 5.2-CURRENT buildworld failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 02:15:56 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov Write: >FreeBSD since at least 502104 has getopt_long_only() in libc, and it >looks like your libc doesn't really have it, like mine: > >$ nm /usr/lib/libc.a | grep getopt_long_only >00000a50 T getopt_long_only > >You somehow broke your build environment (you should know better how) >by having /usr/include/osreldate.h that doesn't match the installed >world (including libc). > >The solution for you is to: > > make buildworld OSRELDATE=502103 > >Specify the real value of your installed FreeBSD_version instead of >502103, or if you aren't sure, just use 0. > > >Cheers, > > yep, I rebuild my libc and it passed !thanks for yours info and reply!