From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 3 06:30:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA15276 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 06:30:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cons.org (knight.cons.org [194.233.237.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA15246; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 06:30:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cracauer@cons.org) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by cons.org (8.8.8/8.7.3) id PAA25141; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:29:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19980903152919.A25123@cons.org> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:29:19 +0200 From: Martin Cracauer To: Satoshi Asami , cracauer@cons.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, vanilla@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Some -devel ports break autoconf (gtk11 spotted) References: <19980819142241.A29002@cons.org> <199809031315.GAA19660@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i In-Reply-To: <199809031315.GAA19660@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 06:15:03AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In <199809031315.GAA19660@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Thanks for your comments. I don't pretend to understand all that you > said, but the -devel prefix thing is a little too much trouble for > now. Should I try to compile GNOME once again, I submit a changed gtk11 port for review, that more useful than the long description. My proposal doesn't require any other -devel port to move to $(PREFIX-DEVEL), so an isolated one would help. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 Paper: (private) Waldstrasse 200, 22846 Norderstedt, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message