Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 06:14:43 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r311414 - head/www/pecl-APC Message-ID: <20130202061443.GA22797@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgki3y0NkOd19zYuEUv6P%2BPfPdSCApH1OxOa=XO18GeuLA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201302020346.r123kLer085367@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgki3y0NkOd19zYuEUv6P%2BPfPdSCApH1OxOa=XO18GeuLA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:47:13PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 1 February 2013 22:46, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: sunpoet > > Date: Sat Feb 2 03:46:20 2013 > > New Revision: 311414 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/311414 > > > > Log: > > - Revert to 3.1.13 > > - Bump PORTREVISION for updated source > > > > 3.1.14 was withdrawn by author from PECL page due to reported problems. > > In order not to bump PORTEPOCH, I changed MASTER_SITES to my LOCAL where > > the new 3.1.14 tarball is identical to 3.1.13 tarball from PECL page. > > IMHO this keeping of the wrong version number is confusing and wrong. > It makes it more difficult to determine which upstream version is > being referenced. Further, for a user that knows that .14 was > withdrawn it makes this port seems bogus. > > In this case nothing is wrong with PORTEPOCH and we should not have an > allergy to it. While I do have an allergy to PORTEPOCH, I see your point. I would suggest we wait a few days, maybe the author will release 3.1.15 soonish given that he's aware of the problem. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130202061443.GA22797>