From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb 23 22:01:16 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA12166
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 22:01:16 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA12160
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 22:01:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA05007; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 22:00:50 -0800 (PST)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: softupdates patches.. commit requirements? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Feb 1998 10:27:50 +0800."
             <34F23026.446B9B3D@whistle.com> 
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 22:00:49 -0800
Message-ID: <5003.888300049@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> What requirements need be satisfied before the softupdate hooks and
> mods can be checked into -current.?

Do they work with ccds yet?  They should at least be fairly
non-pathological with whatever filesystems one might wish to use them
for, but beyond that I'd say go for it!

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message