Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Feb 2025 18:04:00 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyAyODIxMjFdIHRleHRwcm9jL2xhY2hlY2s6IHVwZGF0ZSAx?= =?UTF-8?B?LjI2IOKGkiAxLjMwLCB0YWtlIG1haW50YWluZXJzaGlw?=
Message-ID:  <bug-282121-7788-Fb5jOQVFSR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-282121-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-282121-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282121

--- Comment #6 from Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernape@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Druzenko from comment #5)
Last updates: Fri Dec 27 09:21:31 MST 2002     Fri Sep 24 08:44:20 2004    =
 Thu
Nov 4 06:13:17 2004=20

Than qualifies as abandonware IMO. It is likely that the lacheck program in
print/textlive-base is much better and detects errors that textproc/lacheck
can't.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-282121-7788-Fb5jOQVFSR>