From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jun 3 12:19:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA17610 for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 12:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA17603 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 12:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA02914; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 12:19:51 -0700 (PDT) To: jwb@fore.com cc: bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppp and static IP (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Jun 1997 09:22:41 EDT." <199706031322.JAA05206@jwb.fore.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 12:19:51 -0700 Message-ID: <2910.865365591@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > This is a compatibility issue between a Bay release and seems to be unique > to freebsd pppd. Bay claims the freebsd crew screwed up. I thought you might > like to know. If I am wrong on either assumption please accept my sincere > apologies. I'm a user, not a developer (or even programmer for that matter). We do like to know about such things, but I don't see how we have any hope of actually doing anything about this without a lot more debugging information. It's sort of like calling up tech support and saying "my computer doesn't work." They ask "what do you mean? how?" and you answer "I don't know, it just doesn't work. Thought you guys would want to know, that's all." Things can only go rapidly downhill from there, you dig? That's why I asked you to try out userland ppp first so that we could at least narrow down the behavior to pppd or not. That's the first level of coarse adjustment, lacking much detail about the actual failure with pppd. We certainly can't afford to go out and buy a Bay Networks device, so I'm genuinely puzzled as to what you expected us to accomplish with so little information. :-( Jordan