From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 13 0:23:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.atl.bellsouth.net (mail2.atl.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB7514E79 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 00:23:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wghicks@bellsouth.net) Received: from wghicks.bellsouth.net (host-216-78-101-24.asm.bellsouth.net [216.78.101.24]) by mail2.atl.bellsouth.net (3.3.4alt/0.75.2) with ESMTP id DAA01033 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 03:23:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wghicks.bellsouth.net (IDENT:wghicks@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wghicks.bellsouth.net (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id DAA05354 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 03:29:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wghicks@wghicks.bellsouth.net) Message-Id: <199910130729.DAA05354@bellsouth.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: --enable-haifa Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 03:29:28 -0400 From: W Gerald Hicks Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just curious what effect using the --enable-haifa flag for building gcc-2.95.1/x86 would have so I did a comparison using the Dhrystone benchmark from /usr/ports/benchmarks/bytebench. This was run on a Ziatech 200Mhz Pentium cPCI system. I don't know if this is really worth further testing but it seems interesting. Cheers, Jerry Hicks wghicks@bellsouth.net stock -current (1999/10/05) gcc ============================================================================= Dhrystone 2 without register variables 321955.8 lps (10 secs, 6 samples) BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 without register variables 22366.3 321955.8 14.4 i386-portbld-FreeBSD4.0 --enable-haifa ============================================================================= Dhrystone 2 without register variables 323767.4 lps (10 secs, 6 samples) BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 without register variables 22366.3 323767.4 14.5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message