From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 00:56:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24420106566B; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:56:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24D38FC0C; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5625714E621A; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:37:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JYE-BG8wlhie; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (catv-80-98-232-12.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.232.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E17D314E61E8; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:37:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E923E2E.8070809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:37:02 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0a1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/10.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber References: <201110091703.p99H3AXT011263@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E91DAA9.1060103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E91DAA9.1060103@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Warren Block , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:56:08 -0000 On 2011.10.09. 19:32, Glen Barber wrote: > Consistent pre-populated commit messages: Another reason conversion to > SVN would be a "Good Thing(Tm).":-) What's wrong with the current template? What does SVN do better? No criticism, just curiosity because I haven't noticed any difference. Gabor