From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 20:39:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FBF16A423 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0713243D6A for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:39:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD97D19DF7 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:39:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:39:51 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: T000vVsYec1wwoCRi86FoFVaVX3IsAdCgqgUNVHIZTZH 1133469588 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-192-181.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.192.181]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24455713C0 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:39:48 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:39:44 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051201043300.GA97608@ns2.wananchi.com> <438EB173.50005@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <438EB173.50005@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512012039.48575.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Update 5.4 -> 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:39:58 -0000 On Thursday 01 December 2005 08:16, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > It's my suspicion that updating 5.4 to 6.0 via CVSup leaves alot of old > > libraries in place. Is this anywhere near correct? > >... > > Is there an easy way to fix them? >... > Software compiled under 5.x will almost definitely still run perfectly > well when the box is upgraded to 6.0, but as soon as you start installing > new software or upgrading some packages you'll start running into library > version conflicts. Re-installing wholesale will prevent that. There are still about a dozen ports that directly depend on misc/compat5x - most notably the native opera port, and the nvidia driver port. I was just looking at how the compat5x port libraries get used, and it seems the abandoned 5x libraries are used in preference to those in the port despite the fact that the port may pickup security updates. Is there any easy way to clean-out these libraries?