From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 13:42:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97EF106564A; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@ipfw.ru) Received: from mail.ipfw.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:6141::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4605B8FC12; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp170-36-red.yandex.net ([95.108.170.36]) by mail.ipfw.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1R1IO7-0001Uv-RC; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:41:59 +0400 Message-ID: <4E677479.5040903@ipfw.ru> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:41:13 +0400 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110120 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <4E671A9D.2030902@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4E671A9D.2030902@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , Vlad Galu , Hiroki Sato , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FIB separation X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:42:02 -0000 On 07.09.2011 11:17, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 7/16/11 5:43 AM, Vlad Galu wrote: >> Hello, >> Hello! >> A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that enforced >> the scope of routing messages. The general consesus was that the best >> approach would be the OpenBSD way - transporting the FIB number in the >> message and letting the user applications filter out unwanted messages. >> >> Are there any plans to tackle this before 9.0? > > I haven't really been following this unfortunately but I see at least > part got done. (ifconfig) Yes, it is committed as r223735 and r223741. Unfortunately this is not (directly) related to routing socket. kern/134931 still remains as it is. > > is there anything we need to do before 9.0 that is small but would make > a big difference? > (i.e. fixes, tweaks) rtsock is a great candidate :) > > Julian > > One thing that I haven't done and I only recently remembered, was the > ability to have a socket inherit > it's fib from the incoming connection SYN instead of from the socket > opening process. It is a very good idea to have such possibility but it has to be controlled at least by some sort of sysctl or even per-socket ioctl (turned off by default) > (at least I am pretty sure I never got that done. (must go check)). > > >> Thanks, >> Vlad >> >> [1] >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134931_______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > >