From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 31 21:33:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CC516A4CE for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F3743D49 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:33:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9VLWRbm028541; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:32:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:32:27 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20041031.143227.66766057.imp@bsdimp.com> To: rjackson@cserv62.csub.edu From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20041030214258.GB60781@cserv63.csub.edu> References: <20041030214258.GB60781@cserv63.csub.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: host_mem_start value negative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:33:02 -0000 In message: <20041030214258.GB60781@cserv63.csub.edu> Russell Jackson writes: : sysctl hw.pci.host_mem_start : hw.pci.host_mem_start: -2147483648 : : Is this even a legal value? It seems non-sensical to me. I'm running : ACPI and hw.acpi.host_mem_start is missing. Yes. It is a perfectly legal value. Print it as a hex. The ACPI version isn't currently exported as a sysctl. Warner