From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Oct 22 16:49:25 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057E21038943 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A7E844E4; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C50921FBC; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:49:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Trzjgumyq3pjQgP+4YQmiFDtFd8AonHNSoeB4Ng9t Uo=; b=HcZVZtQSDHUOmAM9Y0wYJB84154Rzy7dcWhzJlTaAFyXkiSTWLC92n+jv L/xquzIi/6PR5ScTpwQT/r6QKy8uXuZBwTmPTe1wAi9uP4v5/DMuuPRw/xAJYLgT Pyk26eTUzYkX959vrxxG6/VEZzF69G417Crir0P7ucg44WOAaHaquhRx5gRHPtTb U6dvuDmFapNhErYoDrG76h0BjbfzSBJeHFU9EsqRRKjaHJ+ys3pXvq9okj9MIHzd dZEKU+y6U2pdl/gF1VR8ZPTXTm5vcXVgqBkukplnpau0szOkj6UYLpM4tvE3XQPr rQ9E+s7VujP5CYK7yi1wLtB2aFUcQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8DEC16227D; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1540226963.490541.1550623304.5D6A95A6@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Josh Paetzel To: Brooks Davis , Rick Macklem Cc: FreeBSD Current MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-b315a288 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:49:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20181022160508.GB45769@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20181003155133.GA57729@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20181008170428.GB9766@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20181022160508.GB45769@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> Subject: Re: which way to update export_args structure? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:49:25 -0000 On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > This is the direction I'd been thinking. FWIW, the usecase is more that > once you've moved away from the struct it's easy to make incremental > changes then to use a 32-bit mountd on a 64-bit kernel. Moving toward > size-independent interfaces helps both causes though. > > -- Brooks > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) Brooks, What is the benefit or usecase for running a 32 bit mountd on a 64 bit kernel? -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel