From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 24 23:26:10 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6EDBC5A;
 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:26:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C483E5B;
 Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5511F291.3070202@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:26:09 -0400
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: RELENG_10 performance regression (was Re: 35-40% performance
 drop releng9 vs releng10 openvpn
References: <5509D6C6.4050204@sentex.net>
 <20150318211457.GL51048@funkthat.com> <550B6950.8060806@sentex.net>
 <550C5AAF.9060502@sentex.net> <550C8AEE.4090408@sentex.net>
 <550CB306.7030405@delphij.net> <20150321001559.GB2379@kib.kiev.ua>
 <550CBF80.6030809@sentex.net> <550D93C7.9080709@FreeBSD.org>
 <550DB4B2.7080603@sentex.net> <20150321184238.GO2379@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20150321184238.GO2379@kib.kiev.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>,
 John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, d@delphij.net,
 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:26:10 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/21/2015 14:42, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> It seems to be a consequnce of the code from r222869.  The 
> test_tsc() does not trust the P-state invariant report and 
> explicitely check for the family.  Your CPU family is 0x14, while 
> code only bumps TSC priority for family 0x15+.

We need to find out whether the Bobcat cores have well-synchronized
TSCs.  If it does, we can white-list it, too.  However, I doubt it.

Sorry for the late response,

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVEfKMAAoJEHyflib82/FGZUgH/RZ8LBBeW2ue+0SIJj8Er9Ni
uyEA3KJL7ZmdjuGUtOdDl3s3cwHcTxbKN39rdabjOyJy/OoNnJK3GfL8UgYSpERa
ztdHHNLbxJK9Z3iN7rvjXxQMHBJy3D4LIQ9BXFau3xcO7K8WDXqdHjUZx/ujrSpU
WwDoZRFohvUf2FT1J23NfWBOx0Mnls3PrQm4f6YLhVst6RojDgx8XA24LyIm+AkF
WUZcPttydp9nde1Hc7qyFI5qB3ZMhT1tG9jp+J2jQWeqCn/SPR3VymF+Lyz/T0sC
POEa6NTJf4lWXOHRZ21Fdkrtr1hBltdO1FImX9M2iNlyRwz57UsNW6yJawGhYJA=
=w6Hk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----