From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 15 08:21:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856BE106564A;
	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru
	[46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0BD8FC12;
	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:21:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:18c9:94f1:8e7e:6995])
	(Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
	by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5CC4C4AC2D; 
	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:21:31 +0400 (MSK)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:21:19 +0400
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <42630017.20120815122119@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <157941699.20120815004542@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References: <157941699.20120815004542@serebryakov.spb.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a
	bottlneck?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:21:33 -0000

Hello, Lev.
You wrote 15 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3=D1=83=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B0 2012 =D0=B3., 0:45:=
42:

LS>  Answer looks trivial: router CPU is bottleneck. But here is one additi=
onal
LS> detail: `top' never shows less than 50% of idle when torrents are
LS> active. And `idle' time with torrents traffic is ALWAYS is higher than
LS> without them, but with WiFi traffic.
  Ok,  additional  information:  it  seems,  that  `top'  is liar when
 POLLING is enabled for em0 and vr1 NICs. I'm turned POLLING off, and
 speeds are the same, but `idle' is no more 50%, it is `0%' when
 gateway is overloaded.

 But i still feezes under load with ULE. It looks like ULE is broken.

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>