From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 27 13:10:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A49516A412; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A32E43D77; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:09:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5RD8uAk041434; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:08:56 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k5RD8sIm041433; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:08:54 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:08:53 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20060627130853.GA40621@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <87fyhwf6z0.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20060627111334.GE36941@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060627155452.B87634@mp2.macomnet.net> <200606271415.26559.max@love2party.net> <8764imsrpa.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20060627124651.GI86439@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060627124651.GI86439@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Denis Shaposhnikov , Max Laier , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, bms@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: carp kernel trap X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:10:00 -0000 On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:46:51PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:34:09PM +0400, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: > D> >>>>> "Max" == Max Laier writes: > D> > D> Max> Please try the attached patch and let me know if that fixes > D> Max> things for you. > D> > D> Thank you! It seems that it fixes the panic. I've successfully done > D> > D> # ifconfig fxp0 inet 10.10.14.8/24 > D> # ifconfig carp0 create > D> # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 pass 12345678 10.10.14.4/24 > D> > D> It reports that fxp0 is in promiscuous mode. I don't know is it OK? > > This is OK for carp. ...but a possible to-do item is to program the reception filter in smart NICs so that they receive frames destined to the CARP unicast address(es) without having to go completely promiscuous. -- Yar