Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:53:53 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/init.d/ Message-ID: <19970713195353.AD25187@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <33C90F7A.41C67EA6@bonn-online.com>; from Sebastian Lederer on Jul 13, 1997 19:25:14 %2B0200 References: <19970711093543.62687@tversu.ac.ru> <19970711084614.RJ19398@uriah.heep.sax.de> <33C5EFC1.41C67EA6@bonn-online.com> <19970711211440.BV38545@uriah.heep.sax.de> <33C90F7A.41C67EA6@bonn-online.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Sebastian Lederer wrote:
> What would be the disadvantages if we used
> /etc/local by default (on machines in an nfs-less environment) ?
The ports paradigm is to not install/modify anything outside ${PREFIX}
(except indirectly, e.g. by running ldconfig -m).
The number of NFS-exported /usr/local's probably makes 5 % of the
installed base (wild guess). Just since it applies to you doesn't
mean it's a very general configuration.
--
cheers, J"org
joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970713195353.AD25187>