Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:04:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clang '-g' unused warnings in FreeBSD (linking) Message-ID: <1342379075269-5727113.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20120715180839.GK2338@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <1342359546590-5727055.post@n5.nabble.com> <5002FEB3.3040708@FreeBSD.org> <20120715180839.GK2338@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks, both replies were very informative! Regarding > one could argue that passing '-g' to the link stage is nonsensical, > since ld cannot add debug information, it can only remove it (via the '-s' > flag). Is precisely why I was asking If this was conscious decision on FreeBSD part. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Clang-g-unused-warnings-in-FreeBSD-linking-tp5727055p5727113.html Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1342379075269-5727113.post>