From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 09:59:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E570816A405 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 09:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7997813C458 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 09:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l4BA9Q3f022054; Fri, 11 May 2007 12:09:26 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <46443E8D.7050301@fer.hr> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:59:41 +0200 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= References: <200705102105.27271.blackdragon@highveldmail.co.za> <4643C7DB.6000408@elischer.org> <863b233dq4.fsf@dwp.des.no> <46443AF0.2070006@fer.hr> <86tzuj1ydn.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86tzuj1ydn.fsf@dwp.des.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4605A72565FDB07D337F2B2B" Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:59:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4605A72565FDB07D337F2B2B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > The world would be a much nicer place if people would stop redefining > technical terms to mean whatever suits them. I think you're overreacting. You say: if the database is consistent,=20 it's ACID ("Avoiding database corruption is a necessary requirement for, = rather than a consequence of, ACID") and I say: if the database is ACID, = it's consistent. Aren't we both right? --------------enig4605A72565FDB07D337F2B2B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGRD6SldnAQVacBcgRApu8AKDYmms1Dunxc2z46EHM6rcysCH2EwCg/dfh IQuDqr0FUZoi1T/MErJzUuc= =u8PR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4605A72565FDB07D337F2B2B--