Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:59:41 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps)) Message-ID: <46443E8D.7050301@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <86tzuj1ydn.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200705102105.27271.blackdragon@highveldmail.co.za> <f20c8u$htp$1@sea.gmane.org> <4643C7DB.6000408@elischer.org> <f219f6$3ls$1@sea.gmane.org> <863b233dq4.fsf@dwp.des.no> <46443AF0.2070006@fer.hr> <86tzuj1ydn.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig4605A72565FDB07D337F2B2B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote:
> The world would be a much nicer place if people would stop redefining
> technical terms to mean whatever suits them.
I think you're overreacting. You say: if the database is consistent,=20
it's ACID ("Avoiding database corruption is a necessary requirement for, =
rather than a consequence of, ACID") and I say: if the database is ACID, =
it's consistent. Aren't we both right?
--------------enig4605A72565FDB07D337F2B2B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGRD6SldnAQVacBcgRApu8AKDYmms1Dunxc2z46EHM6rcysCH2EwCg/dfh
IQuDqr0FUZoi1T/MErJzUuc=
=u8PR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig4605A72565FDB07D337F2B2B--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46443E8D.7050301>