From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Dec 4 0:40:59 2000 From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 4 00:40:57 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from christel.heitec.net (christel.heitec.net [193.101.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8210737B400 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 00:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from tashi.admin.er.heitec.net (paladin.heitec.net [193.101.232.30]) by christel.heitec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30EB354813 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by tashi.admin.er.heitec.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F2BD1DE1; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:42:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:42:41 +0100 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP Tricky config Message-ID: <20001204094241.M793@heitec.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <00120216533101.00265@freefire.psi-domain.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <00120216533101.00265@freefire.psi-domain.co.uk>; from heckfordj@psi-domain.co.uk on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 16:50:53 +0000 Organization: Heitec AG From: lenz@heitec.net (Lenz Gschwendtner) Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Jamie, On Sat, 02 Dec 2000, Jamie Heckford wrote: > Reason being it is easier to implement User level Filtering options. do you think you are on the right track? it is really quite simple to modify the ip-adress on win-boxes, do you really want to place your security on the good will of the users? i would overthink this first :) lenz -- (__) eat penguins instead, they start to (++)-----i\ spread around anyway! ~~| BSE | * |_|~|_| FreeBSD Systemadministrator To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message