From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 20:14:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909D81065670 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7FDE8FC17 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2011 20:14:39 -0000 Received: from g227014007.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO mandree.no-ip.org) [92.227.14.7] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 17 Oct 2011 22:14:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX193xP0dmiN3ZE1T+enOypzM1SJyxKAQqvgGVxq/ra gF865qa6//4FSE Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E7A23CF84 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:14:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E9C8CAE.9010403@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:14:38 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4E9B8C43.6090906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E9B8C43.6090906@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Does anyone use mail/demime X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:14:41 -0000 Am 17.10.2011 04:00, schrieb Glen Barber: > Hi, > > As it stands now, the mail/demime port has no "upstream", and > development seems to have stopped at least 2 years ago. > > Does anyone use this? > > If so, would someone like to _become_ "upstream" and revive this piece > of software? > > Otherwise, I'll mark this port as deprecated in 1 week and have it > scheduled for removal 1 month afterwards. Do we have a suitable alternative that we can recommend?