From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 13 17:08:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD981065686; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62E18FC13; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5674D39124; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id 5D85B10059; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B82C1003D; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Alexey Dokuchaev In-Reply-To: <20090713143026.GA36954@regency.nsu.ru> Message-ID: References: <200907072353.n67NrlPh032677@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090713143026.GA36954@regency.nsu.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/scons Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:08:29 -0000 On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> - Update to checkpoint release 1.2.0_20090223 > This change is wrong; PORTREVISION should not be used to encode any > software version part; its sole purpose for ports infrastructure only. > For complex vendor versions, DISTVERSION should be used instead. Right > now, for instance, you've essentially made impossible to bump PORTREVISION, > shall it be required for any reason, without introducing ugly hacks. This sounds very familiar to the status quo I maintained with the lang/gcc ports for some years which I then resolved a few months ago. Philip, you may want to have a look at lang/gcc43 for an example how I addressed this there -- and if you find improvements, let me know. ;-) Gerald