From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 6 02:21:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380F91065678 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97428FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n562Mc9Q068497; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:22:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:21:29 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Steve Bertrand Message-ID: <20090606022129.GA9566@thought.org> References: <20090606015751.GA9600@thought.org> <4A29CDC5.1000801@ibctech.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A29CDC5.1000801@ibctech.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 22++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: is this getting thru? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:21:34 -0000 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:00:37PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > > i got a bizarre bouch back saying that my post from last night had to be > > okayed...... like, say what:_) > > What? > sorry: should have been "bounce back". when i responded to the middle of an on-going debate last night, i received an automated reply that my post had to be approved because there were too many recipients to the message. i'm all for saving net bandwidth, but this is a new one! FWIW:: Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:47:10 +0000 From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Your message to freebsd-questions awaits moderator approval To: kline@thought.org cheers, gary > Steve -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org For FBSD list: http://transfinite.thought.org/slicejourney.php