From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 28 18:47:49 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205B8230
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.217.182])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB918FC15
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:47:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id go10so10803078lbb.13
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UTL9/Zy6B5gfKMHri9oaTqCAPmJjU3fHhvpqi9so8CU=;
 b=G2jQ5TjQHwhkAQ3eZX3rxgFiCB6iM4U4I8txyGEOQqtZKWzW+T7VwcVClAMj5FQ9p2
 KG5/gsMUARoa1gbAH7QZljuEOiQ5ttqTW/rF6KiK/iAP0LxwQxU35KNWeKcx9kUIHfi+
 pdnStT/Hce5fG1aBappIlAiZrRBoim5eECPjbs3q7cwvwWCIgIOu2V1lOlvPxkIXnoDh
 2iN9T5gEnZm6x1UOu6PNdwM2AHGDjEJowousS6236BAUOQbVNecJXeayaLkWILOMHgW8
 dD7xcOfEQeewGjSQAqaOW6O8tEJPoKZF/+ZDtWxBk80Tk/FP2iC6SFrGFJZGDao935Yf
 F54g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.114.100 with SMTP id jf4mr19226084lab.47.1354128465550;
 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.61.33 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJOrxZCyshi0rBXpm__b4Qf6gw=fQe1EMsjnukRE-XKxa-_niw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJOrxZCNeo-v_=LT8x1UniRspzZ5qs_DnnOtnb4DnF-RwGFJFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE-mSOLcc-USkCZqsiCFsp2SqJ7VPDdkkCHRCxP=8hSg=gAjdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJOrxZCyshi0rBXpm__b4Qf6gw=fQe1EMsjnukRE-XKxa-_niw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:47:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CACpH0Mev40Vm8C9PfW8FTqSeWWD8q2KsBD7UzTrb0GHX9UN8gA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Performance Difference on UFS and ZFS
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TWV0aW4gRMO2xZ9sw7w=?= <metindoslu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:47:49 -0000

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Metin D=C3=B6=C5=9Fl=C3=BC <metindoslu@gm=
ail.com> wrote:

> I tested it on a cc1.4xlarge EC2 instance, here is the specs:

> 23 GiB of memory
> 33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core =E2=80=9CNehalem=
=E2=80=9D architecture)
> 1690 GB of instance storage
> 64-bit platform

I suppose the first _enormous_ question is whether this is true for
real hardware rather than just virtual.