Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:47:45 -0500 From: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?B?TWV0aW4gRMO2xZ9sw7w=?= <metindoslu@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance Difference on UFS and ZFS Message-ID: <CACpH0Mev40Vm8C9PfW8FTqSeWWD8q2KsBD7UzTrb0GHX9UN8gA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJOrxZCyshi0rBXpm__b4Qf6gw=fQe1EMsjnukRE-XKxa-_niw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJOrxZCNeo-v_=LT8x1UniRspzZ5qs_DnnOtnb4DnF-RwGFJFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-mSOLcc-USkCZqsiCFsp2SqJ7VPDdkkCHRCxP=8hSg=gAjdw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJOrxZCyshi0rBXpm__b4Qf6gw=fQe1EMsjnukRE-XKxa-_niw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Metin D=C3=B6=C5=9Fl=C3=BC <metindoslu@gm= ail.com> wrote: > I tested it on a cc1.4xlarge EC2 instance, here is the specs: > 23 GiB of memory > 33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core =E2=80=9CNehalem= =E2=80=9D architecture) > 1690 GB of instance storage > 64-bit platform I suppose the first _enormous_ question is whether this is true for real hardware rather than just virtual.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACpH0Mev40Vm8C9PfW8FTqSeWWD8q2KsBD7UzTrb0GHX9UN8gA>