Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:57:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233654] isp(4) regression after r316398 r316399 Message-ID: <bug-233654-5313-cd8fHOSLrq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-233654-5313@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-233654-5313@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233654 --- Comment #3 from aler@playground.ru --- Pre-316398 code only uses MSI-X for 2600+ cards. This change in new code seems to fix the problem. May be it will be better = to add some sysctl to optionally allow MSI-X on 24xx but anyway it should be disabled by default and might be enabled only by explicit request. --- sys/dev/isp/ispmbox.h.orig 2018-12-18 09:49:17.549288000 +0300 +++ sys/dev/isp/ispmbox.h 2018-12-17 04:12:14.056837000 +0300 @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ #define ISP_GET_VPIDX(isp, tag) \ (ISP_CAP_MULTI_ID(isp) ? tag : 0) #define ISP_CAP_MSIX(isp) \ - (IS_24XX(isp)? (isp->isp_fwattr & ISP2400_FW_ATTR_MSIX) : 0) + (IS_26XX(isp)? (isp->isp_fwattr & ISP2400_FW_ATTR_MSIX) : 0) #define ISP_CAP_VP0(isp) \ (IS_24XX(isp)? (isp->isp_fwattr & ISP2400_FW_ATTR_VP0) : 0) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233654-5313-cd8fHOSLrq>