From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 7 02:49:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E26316B7A2 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE1D43D55 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:39:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so71039nzn for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:39:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=D0XEpUFEvSIC+PA7nnHDEYrjlS3gg+lYyJDJPD27JMTCv9oK8fzJWQa9/ps/pzMLDM1EAeUv99plimVhDS3wcfAAYS7Dj9yfWbgn7S0F6T0d6LBkG+/+ICnzx4e5CRsySW7qmjTmLG8thKKxL7lq6KIlDBmdkDmOEpwydUttmXo= Received: by 10.65.234.10 with SMTP id l10mr30842qbr; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.112.17 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:39:50 +0800 From: "Jiawei Ye" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20060607022741.GA11522@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <20060606211113.GA7845@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060607021330.GA11189@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060607022741.GA11522@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:49:45 -0000 On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > If all customizations are to be done in make.conf, what is the point > > of MAKE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf? > > Flexibility, it's not supposed to be the primary means of customizing > your ports, that's make.conf's job. > > Kris Eh, not supposed to be? I have to admit that this idea of "correctness" is new to me. I have been using portupgrade since it came into the ports tree. One thing I like about the portupgrade/portmanager style of managing ports make_args is that they provide a very simple syntax for specifying per-port args. ''=>'arg1 arg2.....' (portupgrade style) |arg1 arg2 arg3| (portmanager style) Does make.conf provide such syntax? Last time I read from the ML, one needs the {curdir} magic boiler plate for that. It is hard on the eyes and reduces useful information on a 80x25 console IMHO. Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming