From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 17:46:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2317816A420 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC54D4437C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 5C9F8F80F for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:46:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 11415F805 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:46:01 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:46:00 -0700 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060127104600.1ffa38c9.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <84dead720601270812vbfab477i27e6def1aed324f6@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060127141626.GA38042@freenix.no> <84dead720601270812vbfab477i27e6def1aed324f6@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:46:02 -0000 On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:42:33 +0530 Joseph Koshy wrote: > > What should I set CPUTYPE to in /etc/make.conf? > > You can leave it blank or set it to 'nocona'. ALong similar vein- is there a difference is between "k8" and "opteron" when running an opteron on i386 arch?? -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?